A few seconds of awkwardness at a corporate event have triggered a much bigger conversation about something Nigerians have been negotiating for years: where does friendliness end and disrespect begin?
A video circulating online shows United Bank for Africa chairman Tony Elumelu being addressed simply as “Tony” by a young woman during an interaction. Elumelu immediately interrupted to correct her.
“No, you won’t call me Tony. You call me Mr. Elumelu, or TOE or Chairman.”
He then added: “I don’t subscribe to that kind of Oyinbo life.”
The clip has gone viral because, beneath the humour, it exposes a genuine generational and cultural disagreement.
Does calling a powerful person by their first name make a workplace more modern—or does it erase a legitimate boundary of respect?
Gen Z Has a Different Relationship With Hierarchy
For younger Nigerians, particularly those shaped by social media, the traditional hierarchy between a billionaire, CEO, manager and young employee can feel increasingly artificial.
On Instagram, X, TikTok and LinkedIn, public figures deliberately cultivate accessibility.
They post selfies.
They reply to comments.
They speak casually.
They call followers “guys.”
They build personal brands around being relatable.
And Tony Elumelu himself has a remarkably accessible digital persona. His use of “TOE”, for example, is part of his public identity.
That creates an interesting contradiction.
A young person may see a billionaire businessman constantly communicating in the language of social media and conclude:
“He's Tony.”
But the person standing in front of her may see the situation differently:
“I am the chairman of the institution hosting this event. Address me accordingly.”
Neither perspective is completely incomprehensible.
The problem is that social media has blurred the boundaries between them.
The Internet Has Destroyed Distance
There was a time when meeting a billionaire was an extraordinary event.
Today, you can watch one eat breakfast.
You can see his family photographs.
You can watch his interviews.
You can comment under his posts.
You can watch his videos from your bedroom.
You can even occasionally receive a reply.
The psychological distance between ordinary people and the powerful has therefore collapsed.
But digital proximity is not necessarily real-world intimacy.
That distinction is increasingly important.
A person being accessible online doesn't automatically mean everyone has been granted permission to address them however they like in every environment.
And that may be the lesson Elumelu was trying to communicate.
Was Elumelu Right?
In the context of a formal corporate event, there is a strong argument that he was.
Nigerian society has traditionally placed considerable importance on titles and forms of address, particularly when dealing with elders, senior executives and people occupying positions of authority.
Calling someone “Mr. Elumelu,” “Chairman” or another accepted title isn't necessarily about worshipping wealth.
It can simply be about recognising the context.
If you're at a university event, you may call a lecturer “Professor.”
In court, you address a judge as “My Lord.”
In the military, ranks matter.
In a corporate environment, titles can similarly establish professional boundaries.
The fact that someone is approachable does not necessarily eliminate those boundaries.
But the Young Woman's Mistake Also Says Something Important
It would be easy to turn the incident into another lecture about how “Gen Z has no respect.”
That would be lazy.
The young woman's mistake may actually reveal how dramatically professional culture has changed.
Today's younger professionals have been taught to value:
informality, accessibility, equality and authenticity.
In many international corporate environments, senior executives routinely encourage employees to use their first names.
The logic is that titles can create unnecessary psychological barriers.
A junior employee who can say “Sarah” instead of “Mrs. Williams” may feel more comfortable challenging an idea.
A young employee may be less intimidated by a CEO who says:
“Call me David.”
There is nothing inherently wrong with that model.
But it isn't universal.
And the mistake is assuming that one culture's definition of professional friendliness automatically applies everywhere.
The “Oyinbo Life” Comment Is the Most Interesting Part
Elumelu's reference to “Oyinbo life” makes this more than a corporate etiquette story.
He was explicitly rejecting the Westernised convention of casually addressing senior people by their first names.
And that opens a much bigger Nigerian debate.
How much of what Nigerians call “modern professionalism” is actually imported cultural behaviour?
The first-name convention is common in Britain, America and other Western professional environments.
But Nigeria has its own social traditions surrounding age, status and respect.
Neither system is inherently superior.
The problem begins when Nigerians assume that adopting Western corporate etiquette automatically makes them more sophisticated.
It doesn't.
Culture isn't a software update.
You don't become more modern simply because you call your boss “Mike.”
But Respect Should Never Become Servility
There is another side to this conversation that deserves equal attention.
Nigeria has sometimes taken hierarchy too far.
We have created environments where young people are expected to flatter powerful people rather than question them.
Where titles become more important than competence.
Where wealthy individuals are treated as though wealth automatically confers wisdom.
Where someone with political or corporate power can demand excessive deference.
That isn't healthy either.
Respect should not mean:
“You are rich, therefore I am inferior.”
It should mean:
“I recognise your position, while retaining my dignity and voice.”
That's an important distinction.
A young employee should be able to respect a chairman without becoming psychologically subordinate to him.
Elumelu's Response Also Shows the Difference Between Being Accessible and Being Informal
This may ultimately be the most useful lesson from the viral moment.
Executives increasingly want two things simultaneously:
accessibility and authority.
They want young people to feel comfortable approaching them.
They want to appear relatable.
They want social-media engagement.
They want personal brands.
But when someone crosses a boundary, they want the authority of their position recognised.
There is nothing necessarily contradictory about that.
A CEO can be friendly without being your friend.
A billionaire can answer your Instagram comment without inviting you to call him by his first name.
A chairman can joke with employees while still expecting professional boundaries during formal engagements.
Accessibility is not the same thing as familiarity.
The Bigger Generation Gap
What makes this clip fascinating isn't really whether the woman should have said “Tony.”
It is what the moment represents.
Older generations tend to see hierarchy as a framework that maintains order.
Younger generations increasingly see hierarchy as something that must justify itself.
The older generation asks:
“Why didn't you show respect?”
The younger generation asks:
“Why should someone's status determine how I address them?”
That philosophical difference is going to appear increasingly often in Nigerian workplaces.
Gen Z is entering organisations where many of its senior leaders grew up with completely different ideas about authority.
The result will inevitably be friction.
Some of that friction will be healthy.
Some will simply be misunderstanding.
And There Is a Lesson for Gen Z Too
If you're entering the corporate world, don't confuse informality with equality.
You may have equal human worth with the CEO.
You may have the right to challenge their decisions.
You may be exceptionally talented.
You may even have more knowledge about certain technologies than they do.
But professional environments operate within contexts.
Learn the room.
If someone tells you how they prefer to be addressed, respecting that preference costs almost nothing.
You don't have to agree with their worldview.
You simply have to understand professional boundaries.
That is not servility.
It is emotional intelligence.
And There Is a Lesson for Nigerian Executives
The lesson goes in the other direction too.
If you want young Nigerians to see you as approachable, don't be surprised when they eventually behave as though you are approachable.
You cannot spend years telling young people:
“I'm accessible. I'm one of you. Call me TOE.”
Then suddenly become offended when someone takes that accessibility literally.
Leaders have to communicate their boundaries clearly.
If the preferred address is “Chairman,” say so.
If it's “Mr. Elumelu,” say so.
If it's “Tony,” say so.
People cannot read minds.
The Viral Moment Is Bigger Than Tony Elumelu
Ultimately, this isn't really about one billionaire correcting one young woman.
It's about a Nigeria caught between two social systems.
One says:
Respect hierarchy.
The other says:
Question hierarchy.
One says:
Call your elders by their titles.
The other says:
We're all adults here.
One sees first-name familiarity as disrespect.
The other sees excessive titles as unnecessary intimidation.
Neither side is going away.
And Nigerian workplaces will increasingly have to navigate the tension between them.
Perhaps the healthiest solution isn't choosing one side.
It is understanding context.
Call someone by their first name when they've invited you to.
Use their title when the setting calls for it.
And don't mistake either familiarity or formality for a measure of someone's human worth.
Because the real lesson from Elumelu's viral correction is surprisingly simple:
Social media may have made powerful people feel closer to us—but proximity on a screen doesn't automatically erase the boundaries of real life.
And for Gen Z entering Nigeria's corporate world, that distinction may be one of the most important pieces of professional etiquette to learn.
Comments
Post a Comment